xs
sm
md
lg
xl
View Production

USBands Adjudicators


USBands Adjudicators

About USBands Adjudication

USBands’ primary goal is to serve young performers through competitive events throughout the United States. The cornerstone to that service is a community of adjudicators who are motivated to develop the highest standard of excellence. USBands is in the forefront of adjudication education and standards of performance.

Our community is led by the USBands Adjudicator Leadership Team consisting of Eric Kitchenman - Adjudication Coordinator for USBands,Ginny Kraft – USBands Program Director, Mark Kraft – Music Adjudication Manager, Brian Murphy – Adjudication Liasson. In advisory positions to the Leadership Team are, Ashley Delgado-D’Amore, and Brian Kenny - Recruiting and Communication and Dr. John Villella - Music Adjudication Advisor.

USBands is passionately committed to supporting our adjudicators and our adjudication system with integrity, respect, and a pervading sense of community. We do our very best to place our adjudicators in a variety of regions from week to week, and from year to year to provide fresh, unbiased, supportive, and relevant feedback for every program.

USBands Adjudicator Intake Form

Thank you for your interest in joining the adjudication community at USBands. To begin your onboarding process, please respond to the questions below. Once you have completed this form, a member of the USBands team will reach out to you regarding next steps.

Complete Intake Survey

Philosophy of Adjudication

Our core values are built upon service, partnerships, and community. We understand the impact that quality adjudication can have on the integrity of any competitive event. We believe that it is through a deep commitment to this competitive integrity that trust is established, and the best service can be provided to our community.

The USBands adjudication philosophy emphasizes clear distinctions between the role of adjudicator and the role of program consultant/advisor. We believe that the responsibility for accurate evaluation, ranking, and scoring is what sets the adjudicator apart from the evaluator, clinician, instructional staff, and general audience member. We also believe that a deep commitment to accurate evaluation, ranking, and scoring is the cornerstone of integrity in the competitive arena.

Therefore, we ask that all adjudicators of USBands competitive events limit advice-giving and instead prioritize these specific aspects of their role:

  1. RECOGNIZE and VALUE the degree of achievement demonstrated by the performer and the program.
  2. RANK the competitors in the correct order; and
  3. RATE the competitors through the comparative scores earned during each contest.
  4. COMMENTARY is scoring significant and supports specific caption focus.

Our training program and achievement-based adjudication system are specifically designed to make this possible.


Your browser is out-of-date.

Please update your browser to view this website correctly. Show Me Where To Get The Update

×